![]() The fundamental premise of Allen’s system is the merit-worthy concept of moving things you need to do out of your head (which is a mercurial place to keep critical information) into what the guru describes as a trusted record, a smarter kind of to-do.įrom there, tasks are logged according to project and moved to “next actions,” inviting you to work on them immediately if that makes sense or placing them in a suitable queue for attention, depending on whether they require outside input or just need more time than you have available at the moment. The challenge of Allen’s system is its rigor, you have to commit to working with the system in a serious way if you hope to gain its benefits and most of us GTD flirts have more stories about falling off the wagon than having successful rides to personal organisation. Regular readers of this column will be aware of my interest and flirtation with David Allen’s Getting Things Done (GTD) system for managing your time and workload. Use whichever mode is appropriate for your projects.Thinking Rock is a good place to start exploring the world of personal organisation. We can't install the pipe until the top catch ditch is cleaned because the pipe runs next to it and we'd break it with the tractor if we did it after the pipe was put together, we can't run water to the pipe until the shared ditch is cleaned and so on. We can't do the marking until the gated pipe is installed and we know where the gates are positioned. I don't knwo the ratio but I have lots of both parallel and sequential projects, whatever makes sense.įor example The project to trim the sheep toes has actions of Trim Ewes Toes, Trim Ewe Lamb Toes, Trim Ram Toes & Trim Ram Lamb Toes and is parallel because each group of sheep is in a different pen and we can start with any group.īut the project of Get Irrigation Running for the Year is sequential because it's actions, Clean shared ditch, clean top catch ditch, put together top orchard gated pipe, mark orchard & west field, clean bottom orchard catch ditch, put together pear orchard pasture gated pipe and mark pear orchard pasture depend on the action first in line being done. Omnifocus will, however, only show you as next action the top one. If it's a parallel project like you describe or one with sub-projects that can all be worked on at the same time it only makes sense to put in the available actions. The "one next action" phrase that trips up so many people.īut the reality is that each project needs at least one clearly defined next action. If anything in the strictest sense of GTD you'd ditch the parallel ones and only work sequentially. But, the concept of only seeing items that are actionable was addressed quite clearly.Īre my colleagues right? Should I be working entirely out of parallel projects and ditching sequential projects entirely? ![]() I've read the book several times, and I don't remember this ever being directly addressed. ![]() They say this is not a standard GTD practice, it's something that I've just added to my own workflow. I'm a software developer and a few of my colleagues (who have built some fantastic GTD software) disagree with this methodology. Call girlfriends mom about her ring size Go to the mall and buy ring Make dinner reservations this example, only the first task will show in my next actions list since the other tasks are not available yet. ![]() Sequential projects hide any tasks which are dependent upon a task before it.ġ. I've been heavily relying on Omnifocus's ability to do Parallel vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |